Definition, Betydelse & Anagram | Engelska ordet STATEMENT'S
STATEMENT'S
Definition av STATEMENT'S
- böjningsform av statement
Antal bokstäver
11
Är palindrom
Nej
Sök efter STATEMENT'S på:
Wikipedia
(Svenska) Wiktionary
(Svenska) Wikipedia
(Engelska) Wiktionary
(Engelska) Google Answers
(Engelska) Britannica
(Engelska)
(Svenska) Wiktionary
(Svenska) Wikipedia
(Engelska) Wiktionary
(Engelska) Google Answers
(Engelska) Britannica
(Engelska)
Exempel på hur man kan använda STATEMENT'S i en mening
- In law, non-repudiation is a situation where a statement's author cannot successfully dispute its authorship or the validity of an associated contract.
- The domain of discourse, which specifies the values the variable n is allowed to take, is therefore critical to a statement's trueness or falseness.
- In cryptography, a zero-knowledge proof is a protocol in which one party (the prover) can convince another party (the verifier) that some given statement is true, without conveying to the verifier any information beyond the mere fact of that statement's truth.
- He described falsifiability as a property of "the logical structure of sentences and classes of sentences", so that a statement's scientific or non-scientific status does not change over time.
- argued that the statement's claim that IQ tests were unbiased is not accepted by some prominent researchers of psychometrics who have described problems with using tests on population groups with a substantively different cultural background from those for whom the test was originally designed.
- This stage will in turn have quite likely have been preceded by a still earlier stage in which the witting dreamer will have endeavored to secure the agreement, by prospective dream guides, of the fact of this being a dream, but having been rebuffed by them (the rebuff have been due merely to the statement's not having been made in a style suitable to their literary fashion, which can be quite punctilious).
- Shahan Mufti, a professor at the University of Richmond, told The National that the statement's aim was to prompt the NYT to “eventually concede that there are problems with the story and retract it or at least correct it” after the publication had so far been "digging its heels deeper and deeper".
- Heilman rhetorically asked whether the situation itself was "enough for Steinberg and NGO Monitor's followers without Steinberg having to stretch the truth?" Steinberg later conceded that the statement's phrasing was confusing and revised it.
- Popper asserts that in order to conclusively prove a statement's falsifiability, counterevidence must not refute the statement, it must only contradict it.
Förberedelsen av sidan tog: 159,39 ms.